home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- <text id=90TT0667>
- <title>
- Mar. 19, 1990: Middle East:Four Steps To Peace
- </title>
- <history>
- TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1990
- Mar. 19, 1990 The Right To Die
- </history>
- <article>
- <source>Time Magazine</source>
- <hdr>
- WORLD, Page 30
- MIDDLE EAST
- Four Steps to Peace
- </hdr>
- <body>
- <p>But Israel's Shamir, riled by the heat he is getting from Bush
- and Baker, is balking at the first one
- </p>
- <p> If everything goes according to plan, peace in the Middle
- East is just four steps away. First, Secretary of State James
- Baker will meet in Washington with the Egyptian and Israeli
- foreign ministers to select a Palestinian delegation. That
- group, in turn, will travel to Cairo, where Egyptian President
- Hosni Mubarak will be host for preliminary talks in which the
- Palestinians and an Israeli delegation will set down the ground
- rules for elections in the Israeli-occupied West Bank and Gaza
- Strip. They will use as their framework a proposal put forward
- ten months ago by Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Shamir.
- Balloting will then be held in the occupied territories to elect
- representatives to negotiate a period of limited self-rule.
- Within five years, those representatives will begin
- negotiations on the final status of the disputed territories.
- </p>
- <p> Before any of this can happen, however, Israel must agree
- to attend the Washington conference. And that is where the
- peace process idled last week, when Shamir balked at Baker's
- proposal that the delegation to the Cairo talks include both
- a Palestinian who maintains an office or a second residence in
- East Jerusalem and a Palestinian deported from the territories.
- Shamir's intransigence brought his Likud Party into direct
- conflict with the other major member of his coalition
- government, the Labor Party, which has embraced Baker's
- conditions. The impasse threatens to derail both the peace
- process and the 15-month-old national unity government.
- </p>
- <p> The disagreement about talking about talks also threatens
- to further strain tensions between Jerusalem and Washington.
- In recent weeks the Bush Administration has made known its
- impatience with Shamir's delaying tactics. On March 1, Baker
- told a House subcommittee, "We've really done pretty much all
- we can do...we are awaiting a response from the Israeli
- government." In his testimony, Baker riled Israelis by saying
- that he was "satisfied" the Palestine Liberation Organization
- was adhering to its commitment not to employ terrorism against
- Israel, that he favors cuts in aid to Israel and that Israel
- must agree to halt all settlement activity in the occupied
- territories before the U.S. would approve $400 million in loan
- guarantees for housing Soviet Jewish immigrants. Two days
- later, President Bush raised the fever in Jerusalem by stating
- that he opposes settlements not only in the territories but
- also in East Jerusalem.
- </p>
- <p> What makes the wrangling particularly frustrating is that,
- two weeks ago, Shamir appeared ready to sign on to the
- Washington meeting. But last week Shamir succumbed to pressure
- from Likud hard-liners, who argue that Baker's conditions will
- put Jerusalem up for negotiation and allow an indirect role for
- the P.L.O. He demanded that East Jerusalem's 140,000 Arabs not
- vote or run in elections and warned that Israel would walk away
- from any negotiations that appeared to involve the P.L.O.
- </p>
- <p> Shamir has hopelessly encumbered Baker's formula, which in
- its own convoluted fashion aimed to grant the P.L.O. leadership
- an indirect voice while enabling Israel to pretend that the
- P.L.O. was not a party to the talks. Labor has vowed that if
- the Cabinet does not endorse Baker's formula, it will pull out
- of the coalition. So much for simple four-step peace plans.
- </p>
- <p>By Jill Smolowe. Reported by Dean Fischer/Cairo and Jon D.
- Hull/Jerusalem.
- </p>
-
- </body>
- </article>
- </text>
-
-